Archive for August, 2008

The original sin

August 11, 2008

I distinctly remember my first Evil Deed. The difference between a mistake, even of the most devastating kind, and an Evil Deed, however minor, lies in the intent of the wrongdoer. An Evil Deed has harming another being as its distinct (or fuzzy, as the case may be) intent; a mistake, even one that will harm another being, doesn’t start out with this goal. I was four years old when I first set the goal and accomplished it. A glimpse of the innermost nature of Evil was revealed to me from behind the first veil. There were many more hiding it, as it turned out; the first veil proved to be the one that separates the world of innocent incompetence from the world of morally corrupt knowledge. Here’s how I found out.

It was my first day in kindergarten. I already knew how to read, but I didn’t yet know how to socialize, having been shielded from almost all contact with other kids up to that time. The multitude of child beings suddenly present in my life overwhelmed me. They were incomprehensible, I didn’t know the first thing about them. They were loud and moved about a lot, spinning all around me without inviting or involving me in their live merry-go-round. Some were bigger than me — most were — and some were smaller. The ones who were smaller proved stupid — I tried to make conversation with a few of them but I couldn’t understand their childish way to pronounce words. My Russian was impeccably correct by the time, save for the “r” sound which I later had to have a couple of lessons with a speech therapist to learn how to rrrrock and rrrroll between the tongue and the upper palate, which is how you make the Russian “r,” and my vocabulary was perhaps at least ten years ahead of its time. Some of the bigger kids seemed to have trouble with it though — a girl in a checkered dress approached me and asked me something, I gave her a thoroughly thought-through response, whereupon she made a sour face and pinched my upper arm with sudden determination and speed of an attacking cobra, and immediately ran to the teacher wailing, “The new girl hit me! The new girl beat me up!” The teacher made me stand in the corner facing the wall and “think of my behavior.” I was baffled, but I obeyed. I thought about my behavior and decided that I was the lowest of the low and therefore fair game for anyone who would have the time and inclination to do any kind of damage to me they could possibly dream up. My mood was in the gutter.

Then they let us all out to play. I wandered aimlessly in the yard, I didn’t know how to play and no one bothered noticing it. There was one other kid uninvolved in the general commotion, a boy bigger than me, who also wandered aimlessly, looking at the world through docile eyes of a lost puppy. I tried talking to him, and discovered that his power of speech was even feebler than that of the smaller kids. He was making indistinct sounds that conveyed no meaning whatsoever. I didn’t seem to have any use for his presence, so I abandoned him and got myself interested in a patch of uncultivated land in between some flower beds. I noticed a familiar plant there — a thistle, tall, with thorny leaves and clawed flower buds. I was no stranger to eating flowers, out of curiosity, but I’d never tired this one. With some reluctance, I carefully picked one of the buds and put it in my mouth. The little claws scratched my tongue, and I felt that biting into this thing would be a mistake. I was about to spit it out when the docile tongue-tied boy approached me again and indicated, with hand gestures clarifying his mumbling enough for me understand him, that he wanted whatever it was that I was eating.

In a flash of evil genius, my demolished mood and my emerging knowledge made a sinister, treacherous pact. For the first time in my life, I was about to trick another being into harm.

I carefully spat the thistle bud into my hand and hid it behind my back. “This is fruit,” I told the boy, “but I won’t give you any, I don’t have any for you, it’s all for me. It’s delicious. Yum, yum. You have to chew it hard and it’s all sweet and juicy inside. You wouldn’t know how to do it. You can’t chew hard enough.” The boy made sounds of protest and nodded his head energetically, indicating that he was, indeed, proficient enough in chewing, if not in human speech. His outstretched hand and his pleading eyes completed the message for him.

Into his pleading, hopeful eyes I looked, and into his outstretched hand I put the forbidden fruit of knowledge of good and evil.

He bit into the thistle bud with all his might. All the little claws must have embedded themselves into his gums so efficiently that his jaws were instantly locked shut — apparently he was no longer able to separate them. His face went red, his eyes exploded with helpless tears, and he started wailing through the clenched jaws. He ran to the teacher, bellowing, flailing his arms and pointing an accusatory finger at me. But didn’t I already know what would happen. Didn’t I already envision the plight of my accuser, didn’t I know he would be unable to explain my crime?.. Earlier, I got punished for a crime I didn’t commit. Now was my time to get off the hook with the crime I did commit. Justice, I was shaping you into what you shouldn’t have ever been, but I was only four and I knew no better than to learn via an innocent’s route of losing her innocence to the fool’s method of trial and error. (Which, as an aside, our science is so fond of even in its mature technological adulthood forever entangled in moral infancy.)

The boy spent the rest of the day picking the thistle claws from his gums, from between his teeth, probably from his tongue. Several times he approached me with mumbled accusations, complaints, and — I swear — attempts at understanding. Futile attempts, of course, I didn’t understand it myself.

The lighter side of Einstein

August 11, 2008

This was republished in September 2002 Scientific American
Originally published (JEST, Vol. 1, No. 9; 1938 )

“On the Effects of External Sensory Input on Time Dilation.” A. Einstein, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, N.J.

Abstract: When a man sits with a pretty girl for an hour, it seems like a minute. But let him sit on a hot stove for a minute and it’s longer than any hour. That’s relativity.

As the observer’s reference frame is crucial to the observer’s perception of the flow of time, the state of mind of the observer may be an additional factor in that perception. I therefore endeavored to study the apparent flow of time under two distinct sets of mental states.

Methods: I sought to acquire a hot stove and a pretty girl. Unfortunately, getting a hot stove was prohibitive, as the woman who cooks for me has forbidden me from getting anywhere near the kitchen. However, I did manage to surreptitiously obtain a 1924 Manning-Bowman and Co. chrome waffle iron, which is a reasonable equivalent of a hot stove for this experiment, as it can attain a temperature of a very high degree. Finding the pretty girl presented more of a problem, as I now live in New Jersey. I know Charlie Chaplin, having attended the opening of his 1931 film City Lights in his company, and so I requested that he set up a meeting with his wife, movie star Paulette Goddard, the possessor of a shayna punim, or pretty face, of a very high degree.

Discussion: I took the train to New York City to meet with Miss Goddard at the Oyster Bar in Grand Central Terminal. She was radiant and delightful. When it felt to me as if a minute had passed, I checked my watch to discover that a full 57 minutes had actually transpired, which I rounded up to one hour. Upon returning to my home, I plugged in the waffle iron and allowed it to heat up. I then sat on it, wearing trousers and a long white shirt, untucked. When it seemed that over an hour had gone by, I stood up and checked my watch to discover that less than one second had in fact passed. To maintain unit consistency for the descriptions of the two circumstances, I rounded up to one minute, after which I called a physician.

Conclusion: The state of mind of the observer plays a crucial role in the perception of time.

Time Travel

August 10, 2008

Ninety-nine nanoseconds ago
I learned how to ask about dates
in Mandarin.

Jinnian shi yijiujiujinian? –
“Nineteen ninety-what?”

Nineteen ninety-what?..

Nineteen ninety-nine,
the forever new
year of nineteen ninety-nine,
the new year of
what?..

Dancing the night away as they say,
there’s no number I know how to say
after nineteen ninety-nine,
the last year of
what?..

Dancing the night away,
dancing the Only Way
in the arms of
nineteen ninety-who?..

Where does the night go
when you dance it away?

When you dance your night
away?..

There’s nothing else to learn,
nineteen ninety-love,
dancing out of your arms
into the arms of no return,

dancing your arms away
in the year
two thousand away,
in the year
two thousand never again,
in the year
two thousand done deal,
two thousand no regrets,
two thousand farewells –

Na nian shi na nian?..